Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial
Articles

Konversi Bentuk Kapital Untuk Pengentasan Kemiskinan Multidimensional Pada Penerima Bantuan Sosial Kewirausahaan di Kecamatan Bojonggede, Kabupaten Bogor

PDF
  • Astriyana Telaumbanua,
  • Robert M.Z Lawang
Astriyana Telaumbanua
Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Robert M.Z Lawang
Departemen Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v14i1.3524

Published 2024-12-20

Keywords

  • konversi kapital, kewirausahaan, rumah tangga miskin, kemiskinan multidimensional, Kabupaten Bogor

How to Cite

Telaumbanua, A., & Lawang, R. M. (2024). Konversi Bentuk Kapital Untuk Pengentasan Kemiskinan Multidimensional Pada Penerima Bantuan Sosial Kewirausahaan di Kecamatan Bojonggede, Kabupaten Bogor. Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v14i1.3524

Copyright (c) 2024 Astriyana Telaumbanua, Lawang (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Penelitian ini berfokus untuk mengidentifikasi bentuk-bentuk kapital (ekonomi, sosial, embodied dan digital) yang dimiliki oleh penerima bantuan sosial kewirausahaan di Kecamatan Bojonggede, Kabupaten Bogor melalui konversi untuk mempercepat proses pengentasan kemiskinan multimensional. Dengan menggunakan metode fenomenologis, kami mengumpulkan data melalui wawancara mendalam dan observasi dari tujuh penerima bantuan sosial kewirausahaan dari Kementerian Sosial RI, yang masih menjalankan usahanya dengan menggunakan teknik pursposive sampling dari empat desa di Kecamatan Bojonggede, Kabupaten Bogor. Penelitian ini berfokus pada bagaimana bentuk-bentuk kapital dimanfaatkan oleh penerima bantuan untuk menjalankan dan mempertahankan kegiatan usaha melalui proses konversi dengan menggunakan kerangka teori praktik dari Pierre Bourdieu. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa kapital ekonomi, sosial, digital dan embodied saling berinteraksi mendukung keberlanjutan usaha rumah tangga miskin. Kapital sosial memainkan peran penting dalam proses konversi kapital. Jaringan sosial dan kepercayaan membantu rumah tangga miskin mendapatkan sumber daya tambahan. Keterampilan embodied yang sudah dimiliki penerima bantuan mengotimalkan bantuan sosial kewirausahaan yang mereka terima. Sementara kapital digital masih terbatas pemanfaatannya namun memperkuat kapital sosial yang sebelumnya telah terbangun. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberi masukkan dalam melaksanakan program bantuan sosial yang lebih terintegrasi agar lebih tepat guna mengentaskan kemiskinan multidimensional.

PDF

References

  1. Addeo, F., DAuria, V., Delli Paoli, A., Punziano, G., Ragnedda, M., & Ruiu, M. L. (2023). Measuring digital capital in Italy. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1144657
  2. Adi, I. R. (2024). Praktik Komunitas, Intervensi Komunitas dan Pengembangan Masyarakat Sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Edisi Revisi 2023) (Yayat Sri Hayati, Ed.). Rajawali Pers. PT Rajagrafindo Persada. http://www.rajagrafindo.co.id
  3. Ailiyah, N., Chalimah, N., Fauzi, M. A. N., & Wahyudi, M. A. (2023). Efektivitas Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai (BPNT) terhadap Kehidupan Perekonomian Masyarakat Desa Seboro Kabupaten Probolinggo . Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 12(3 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v12i3.3359
  4. Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2014). Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index. World Development, 59, 251–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.026
  5. Asimaki, A., & Koustourakis, G. (2014). Habitus: An Attempt at a Thorough Analysis of a Controversial Concept in Pierre
  6. Hill, I. (2018). How did you get up and running? Taking a Bourdieuan perspective towards a framework for negotiating strategic fit. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(5–6), 662–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1449015
  7. Hill, I. R. (2021). Spotlight on UK artisan entrepreneurs’ situated collaborations: through the lens of entrepreneurial capitals and their conversion. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0642
  8. Park, L. Y. J., Oh, Y. W., & Sang, Y. (2024). Digital Access, Digital Literacy, and Afterlife Preparedness: Societal Contexts of Digital Afterlife Traces. Social Media + Society, 10(3), 20563051241274676. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241274676
  9. Payne, G. T., & Hayes, N. T. (2021). Social capital, entrepreneurship, and family businesses. In Family Entrepreneurship: Insights from Leading Experts on Successful Multi-Generational Entrepreneurial Families (pp. 331–344). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66846-4_24
  10. Perkumpulan PRAKARSA. (2023). Indeks Kemiskinan Multidimensi Indonesia di 34 Provinsi di Indonesia 2012-2021.
  11. Pret, T., Shaw, E., & Drakopoulou Dodd, S. (2015). Painting the full picture: The conversion of economic, cultural, social and symbolic capital. International Small Business Journal, 34(8), 1004–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615595450
  12. Ragnedda, M. (2018a). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2366–2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006
  13. Ragnedda, M. (2018b). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2366–2375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006
  14. Ragnedda, M., Addeo, F., & Laura Ruiu, M. (2022). How offline backgrounds interact with digital capital. New Media & Society, 26(4), 2023–2045. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221082649
  15. Ragnedda, M., & Ruiu, M. L. (2020). Digital Capital: A Bourdieusian Perspective on the Digital Divide. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/978-1-83909-550-420201008/full/pdf?title=prelims
  16. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., & Addeo, F. (2020). Measuring Digital Capital: An empirical investigation. New Media and Society, 22(5), 793–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869604
  17. Shepherd, D. A., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2020). Entrepreneurship and Poverty Alleviation: The Importance of Health and Children’s Education for Slum Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(2), 350–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719900774
  18. Shingirai, N. (2023). The Entrepreneurial Habitus of Zimbabweans in South Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 00219096231197766. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231197766
  19. Silva, T. A. S., Corrêa, V. S., Vale, G. M. V, & Giglio, E. M. (2020). Influence of social capital offline and online on early-stage entrepreneurs. Revista de Gestao, 27(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-10-2019-0103
  20. Smaguc, T., & Vukovic, K. (2023). Forms and conversions of the economic capital of Croatian entrepreneurs in the computer programming industry with insights into variations of the company’s development stages. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 47(2), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.31341/jios.47.2.4
  21. Smith, C., Smith, J. B., & Shaw, E. (2017). Embracing digital networks: Entrepreneurs’ social capital online. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.003
  22. Suri, D. M., Yogia, M. A., & Suyastri, C. (2023). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Sekitar Objek Wisata dengan Memanfaatkan Modal Sosial. Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 12(3 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v12i3.3363
  23. Tantriana, A., & Rakhmawan, S. A. (2024). Looking at Social Assistance: Is It Effective in Strengthening the Economy in East Java. East Java Economic Journal, 8(2), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.53572/ejavec.v8i2.126
  24. Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to Qualitiative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. (Fourth Edition). John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  25. Villanueva-Mansilla, E., Nakano, T., & Evaristo, I. (2015). From Divides to Capitals: An Exploration of Digital Divides as Expressions of Social and Cultural Capital. In Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Vol. 10, pp. 89–117). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010004
  26. Wong, N. D., & McGovern, T. (2022). Entrepreneurial strategies in a family business: growth and capital conversions in historical perspective. Business History, 65(3), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2020.1807952
  27. Xie, Y., & Xie, E. (2021). Comparing Income Poverty with Multidimensional Well-being Based on the “Conversion Efficiency.” Social Indicators Research, 154(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02561-y
  28. Zelekha, Y., & Dana, L.-P. (2019). Social Capital Versus Cultural Capital Determinants of Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Study of the African Continent . In The Journal of entrepreneurship (Vol. 28, Issue 2, pp. 250–269). SAGE Publications . https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355719851900
  29. Zhao, F., Barratt-Pugh, L., Standen, P., Redmond, J., & Suseno, Y. (2022). An exploratory study of entrepreneurial social networks in the digital age. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(1), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2020-0359
  30. Zhao, J., & Li, T. (2021). Social Capital, Financial Literacy, and Rural Household Entrepreneurship: A Mediating Effect Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724605