Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial
Articles

Analisis Pemanfaatan Bantuan Sosial untuk Pengurangan Kerentanan Ekonomi: Studi Kasus di Kalurahan Ngargosari, Kecamatan Samigaluh, Kabupaten Kulon Progo

PDF
  • Istiana Hermawati,
  • Asep Kusnali,
  • Toton Witono,
  • Adji Muhammad,
  • Saryana Saryana
Istiana Hermawati
1 Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan, Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD", Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 2 Pusat Riset Kebijakan,Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Asep Kusnali
3 Pusat Riset Kesehatan Masyarakat dan Gizi, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN), Cibinong, Indonesia.
Toton Witono
1 Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan, Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD", Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 4 Pusdiklat dan Pengembangan Profesi, Kementerian Sosial RI, Jakarta, Indonesia
Adji Muhammad
1 Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan, Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD", Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Saryana Saryana
1 Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan, Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD", Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v14i1.3501

Published 2024-12-20

Keywords

  • Ngargosari village, social assistance, poverty alleviation, beneficiaries, mixed methods

How to Cite

Hermawati, . I., Kusnali, A., Witono, T. ., Muhammad, A., & Saryana, S. (2024). Analisis Pemanfaatan Bantuan Sosial untuk Pengurangan Kerentanan Ekonomi: Studi Kasus di Kalurahan Ngargosari, Kecamatan Samigaluh, Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v14i1.3501

Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Istiana Hermawati, M.Sos, Asep, Toton, Suradji, Saryana Saryana (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Bantuan sosial merupakan instrumen penting dalam pengentasan kemiskinan, terutama di daerah perdesaan yang rentan secara ekonomi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pemanfaatan bantuan sosial oleh keluarga penerima manfaat di Kalurahan Ngargosari, Kecamatan Samigaluh, Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Menggunakan metode mixed methods dengan Kalurahanin concurrent embedded, penelitian melibatkan 40 responden dan 10 informan. Mayoritas responden berusia produktif, berstatus menikah, bekerja sebagai ibu rumah tangga, berpendidikan SMA, menanggung 4 jiwa dan berpenghasilan rendah. Hasil menunjukkan, bahwa sebagian besar responden memanfaatkan bantuan sosial untuk memenuhi kebutuhan mendesak seperti pendidikan dan pangan, dan untuk menangani masalah finansial seperti hutang dan kebutuhan lainnya. Kontribusi bantuan sosial terhadap pendapatan keluarga berkisar antara 4 persen sampai dengan 58,9 persen dan terhadap pengeluaran 4,89 persen sampai dengan 47,18 persen. Bantuan sosial memainkan peran penting dalam mendukung kesejahteraan ekonomi keluarga, terutama dalam memenuhi kebutuhan dasar. Namun, 85 persen responden masih berada di bawah garis kemiskinan nasional. Meski membantu meringankan beban ekonomi, diperlukan peningkatan efektivitas program bantuan sosial melalui penargetan yang lebih tepat dan pemberdayaan ekonomi. Rekomendasi yang diajukan mencakup integrasi program bantuan sosial dengan literasi keuangan dan pemberdayaan untuk meningkatkan kemandirian penerima manfaat.

PDF

References

  1. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2008). Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  2. Arfandi, R. Z., Studi, P., Pembangunan, E., Trisakti, U., Studi, P., Ekonomi, I., & Trisakti, U. (2022). Dampak Program Bantuan Sosial Terhadap Program Utama Bansos di Indonesia. Media Ekonomi, 30(1), 1–15.
  3. Barrientos, A. (2013). The Rise of Social Assistance in Brazil. Development and Change, 44(4), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12043
  4. Bazzi, S., Sumarto, S., & Suryahadi, A. (2012). Evaluating Indonesia unconditional cash transfer program, 2005-6. 3Ieimpact.Org, October. https://www.3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/ow176_finalreport_Indonesia_unconditional_cashtransfer.pdf
  5. Becker, G. S. (1975). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1986.00520010054022
  6. Brazys, S. (2018). Aid dependence as aid persistence? Non-declining aid and growth. Journal of International Relations and Development, 21(3), 717–738. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0087-z
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Creswell John W, Clark Vicki L Plano - Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research-SAGE Publications (2018).
  8. Dinda Pramisita, A. A., Nyoman Saskara, I. A., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Wiwin Setyari, N. P. (2023). Analysis of the Effectiveness and Impact of Cash Social Assistance of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Consumption Expenditures of Poor Households (Muslim Majority) in Indonesia. IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 12(2), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v12i2.2242
  9. Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. Macmillan.
  10. Firmansyah, A. D., & Solikin, A. (2019). Who Gains From Social Assistances? Rastra, Pip, And Pkh Programs In Indonesia . Jurnal BPP: Badan Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Keuangan, 12(1), 53–70.
  11. https://doi.org/10.48108/jurnalbppk.v12i1.372
  12. Giles, J., & Satriawan, E. (2015). Protecting child nutritional status in the aftermath of a financial crisis: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 114, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.12.001
  13. Hardjono, J., Akhmadi, N., And, & Sumarto, S. (2010). Poverty and Social Protection in Indonesia. In Books and Monographs (pp. xv–xx). Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute; Cambridge University Press (online).
  14. Holzmann, R., & Jørgensen, S. (2001). Social Risk Management: A New Conceptual Framework for Social Protection, and Beyond. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(4), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011247814590
  15. Hulme, D., & Barrientos, A. (2008). Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest in Developing Countries: Reflections on a Quiet Revolution. SSRN Electronic Journal, November. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265576
  16. Ivankova, N. V, Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
  17. Kementerian Sosial RI. (2020). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Program Keluarga Harapan Tahun 2021. Direktorat Jenderal Perlindungan dan Jaminan Sosial, Kementerian Sosial RI.
  18. Laksono, A. D., Dwi Wulandari, R., & Soedirham, O. (2019). Urban and Rural Disparities in Hospital Utilization among Indonesian Adults. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 48(2), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i2.819
  19. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
  20. Negara, S. D., & Tito, M. O. (2021). Indonesia’s Economic Recovery Programmes: Progress and Challenges. Perspective, 135, 1–13.
  21. Nugroho, A., Amir, H., Maududy, I., & Marlina, I. (2021). Poverty eradication programs in Indonesia: Progress, challenges and reforms. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(6), 1204–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.05.002
  22. Olken, B. A., Onishi, J., & Wong, S. (2014). Should Aid Reward Performance? Evidence from a Field Experiment on Health and Education in Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(4), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.4.1
  23. Palaon, H., Wiryono, S. K., & Faturohman, T. (2020). Boosting financial inclusion through social assistance reform: Evidence-based approach in selecting a payment system. Enterprise Development and Microfinance, 31(4), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.20-00013
  24. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  25. Ravallion, M., Chen, S., & Sangraula, P. (2009). Dollar a day revisited. World Bank Economic Review, 23(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhp007
  26. Salecker, L., Ahmadov, A. K., & Karimli, L. (2020). Contrasting Monetary and Multidimensional Poverty Measures in a Low-Income Sub-Saharan African Country. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02382-z
  27. Samuda, S. J. A., & Suprihartiningsih, E. (2023). COVID-19 Social Assistance Program and Poverty: Evidence from Indonesia.
  28. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 20(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v20i2.19088
  29. Saputra, D., & Julia, J. (2021). Non-Parametric Approach to Measuring Accuracy Of Social Assistance Programs in The Middle of Indonesian Economic Downturn. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Manajemen (REKOMEN), 4(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.31002/rn.v4i2.3639
  30. Streeten, P., & Burki, S. J. (1978). Basic needs: some issues. World Development, 6(3), 411–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(78)90116-X
  31. Suryahadi, A., & Al-Izzati, R. (2018). Cards for the Poor and Funds for Villages: Jokowi Initiatives to Reduce Poverty and Inequality. In SMERU Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814843102-015
  32. The World Bank. (2017). Indonesia Social Assistance Reform Reform Program: Technical Assessment. World Bank Group.
  33. W. Runciman, James A. Geschwender. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: a study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. American Sociological Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2091734
  34. Weeks, W. B., Chang, J. E., Pagán, J. A., Lumpkin, J., Michael, D., Salcido, S., Kim, A., Speyer, P., Aerts, A., Weinstein, J. N., &
  35. Lavista, J. M. (2023). Rural-urban disparities in health outcomes, clinical care, health behaviors, and social determinants of health and an action-oriented, dynamic tool for visualizing them. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(10), e0002420. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002420
  36. World Bank Group. (2018). The State of Social Safety Nets 2018. The World Bank.