Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024): Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial
Articles

Prinsip Social Virtue dalam Pengembangan Potensi Diri Anak Penyandang Disabilitas Intelektual di SLB Fitria Kota Bogor

PDF
  • Koesworo Setiawan,
  • Rasyid
Koesworo Setiawan
Universitas Djuanda
Rasyid
Universitas Djuanda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v13i3.3396

Published 2024-11-18

Keywords

  • pendamping sosial,
  • komunikasi interpersonal,
  • disabilitas intelektual

How to Cite

Setiawan, K., & Anwar, M. R. (2024). Prinsip Social Virtue dalam Pengembangan Potensi Diri Anak Penyandang Disabilitas Intelektual di SLB Fitria Kota Bogor . Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v13i3.3396

Copyright (c) 2024 Koesworo Setiawan (Author); Rasyid

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Pengembangan potensi diri anak penyandang disabilitas menjadi perhatian penting di tengah masih lemahnya pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak-hak mereka. Penelitian ini menelaah prinsip berbasis nilai (social virtue) sebagai landasan guru (pandamping) dalam mengembangkan keterampilan seni siswa-siswi disabilitas intelektual (klien) di sekolah luar biasa (SLB). Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara mendalam, dan data sekunder yang relevan. Informan sebanyak empat orang pendamping dan dua orangtua klien sebagai triangulasi yang ditetapkan berdasarkan prinsip purposive sampling. Materi wawancara diturunkan dari tiga konsep operasional: interpersonal skill, peran dan efektifitas komunikasi. Data dikategorikan, diseleksi, diurutkan, dan dikodekan sesuai dengan formulasi konsep dalam menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Hasilnya, “social virtue” ditemukan di hampir semua proses intervensi baik pada area pengetahuan, sikap, maupun perilaku. Kesimpulannya, prinsip “social virtue” menjadi basis, katalis dan motivator pendamping dalam pengembangan keterampilan seni klien.

PDF

References

  1. Adams, R. (2017). Empowerment, participation and social work (4th ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
  2. Aziz, A., Jamaris, M., & Sumadi, T. (2021). Development of a learning disabilities test: a case study at elementary school. In COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education (Vol. 6, Nomor 4, hal. 129–134). Ikatan Konselor Indonesia (IKI). https://doi.org/10.23916/0020210638540
  3. Barbe, M. (2017). Supporting people with complex intellectual disabilities using intensive interaction. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151227129
  4. BPS. (2022). Statistik Pendidikan 2022.
  5. Broom, G. M., & Sha, B.-L. (2013). Cutlip and Center’s Effective Public Relations Eleventh Edition (11th ed.). Pearson.
  6. de Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, C., Prette, A. Del, & Prette, Z. A. P. Del. (2019). Analysis of needs and processes: social skills program for unemployed people with disabilities. Psico-USF. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:210366783
  7. Delgado, E. C., González, I. I. C., González, A. F. C., & Torres, R. A. V. (2018). Development of emotional communication in persons with disabilities through graphic art. 2018 22nd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV), 454–458.
  8. Di Lorito, C., Bosco, A., Birt, L., & Hassiotis, A. (2018). Co-research with adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(5), 669–686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12435
  9. DuBois, B., & Miley, K. K. (2019). An empowering profession. Pearson.
  10. Gea, Y. K., Taftazani, B. M., & Raharjo, S. T. (2023). Pengasuhan Positif Orangtua Dalam Melindungi Hak Anak Dengan Disabilitas. Share: Social Work Journal, 13(1), 60–73.
  11. Gerring, J. (2017). Qualitative methods. Annual review of political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 15-36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-092415-024158
  12. Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., & Windridge, K. (2001). An introduction to qualitative research. Trent focus group London.
  13. Hardina, D. (2013). Interpersonal social work skills for community practice. Springer Publishing Company, 2013.
  14. Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?
  15. hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=_InCDwAAQBAJ%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PP1%5C&dq=qualitative+research%5C&ots=3ugNoWn-kD%5C&sig=S9pOV7nrcre3CT3XDn7-UVWzsW8
  16. Kemdikbud RI. (2021). Melindungi dan menjamin hak-hak anak penyandang disabilitas. ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id. https://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/artikel/detail/melindungi-dan-menjamin-hak-hak-anak-penyandang-disabilitas
  17. Kementerian PPPA. (2021). Kemen PPPA: setiap anak disabilitas berhak memperoleh pendidikan. kemenpppa.go.id. https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/index.php/page/read/29/3380/kemen-pppa-setiap-anak-disabilitas-berhak-memperoleh-pendidikan
  18. Mart’i-Gil, C., Marcos-Pérez, G., Barreira-Hernández, D., & others. (2013). Counseling: una herramienta para la mejora de la comunicación con el paciente. Farmacia Hospitalaria, 37(3), 236–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7399/fh.2013.37.3.559
  19. Mazza, E. (2015). Experiences of Social Work Educators Working With Students With Psychiatric Disabilities or Emotional Problems. Journal of Social Work Education, 51, 359–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1012935
  20. Miley, K. K., O’Melia, M. W., & DuBos, B. L. (2012). Generalist Social Work Practice: An Empowering Approach (7th ed.). Pearson.
  21. Parcell, G., & Collison, C. (2009). No more consultants: We know more than we think (.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://sci-hub.se/10.1002/9781119206583.ch5
  22. Peavy, R. V. (1996). Counselling as a culture of healing. British journal of guidance and counselling, 24(1), 141–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889608253714
  23. Potocky, M., & Guskovict, K. L. (2019). Project MIRACLE: Increasing empathy among psychosocial support staff working with refugees through brief training in motivational interviewing. Intervention, 17, 59–68. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:80809509
  24. Roslina, D., & Rahayu, E. (2018). Peran pendamping dalam meningkatkan keberfungsian sosial penyandang dcisabilitas intelektual pada program pelayanan jarak jauh di kecamatan lembang dan Cililin, kabupaten bandung barat. Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 7(2), 31–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v7i2.1167
  25. Ross, J. W. (2016). Specialist communication skills for social workers: Focusing on service users’ needs. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/63203
  26. Saputri, A. E., Raharjo, S. T., & Apsari, N. C. (2019). Dukungan sosial keluarga bagi orang dengan disabilitas sensorik. Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(1), 62.
  27. Satria, M. H., Aliriad, H., Kesumawati, S. A., Fahritsani, H., Endrawan, I. B., & Adi, S. (2023). Model pengembangan keterampilan motorik My Home Environment terhadap anak disabilitas intelektual. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(2), 2336–2347. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i2.4415
  28. Savita, K., & Sharma, S. (2021). A systematic review of teachers perceptions towards effective teaching-learning of students with intellectual disability. International Journal of Advanced Research, 9, 669–674. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/13789
  29. Schuman, S. P. (1996). Creating collaborative advantage. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221600
  30. Setiawan, K. (2022a). Komunikasi konteks rendah sebagai strategi penguatan citra kelembagaan di kementerian sosial.
  31. CoverAge: Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35814/coverage.v12i2.3133
  32. Setiawan, K. (2022b). Komunikasi Konteks Rendah sebagai Strategi Penguatan Citra Kelembagaan di Kementerian Sosial. CoverAge: Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(2), 122–137.
  33. Setiawan, K. (2023). Peran humas pemerintah di tengah badai pandemi: Studi deskriptif kampanye program perlindungan sosial (Rohlani Mawardi (ed.)). Jagat Mitra Kertiyasa.
  34. Shree, A., & Shukla, P. C. (2016). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, causes and characteristics. Learning Community-An International Journal of Educational and Social Development, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-458X.2016.00002.6
  35. Spann, E., Biggs, E. E., & Ross, M. (2023). Supports and empowerment for families of children with extensive support needs throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 48(3), 139–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796923118
  36. Thorne, B., & Dryden, W. (1993). Counselling. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Buckingham, Bristol.
  37. Tiberg, I., Hansson, K., Holmberg, R., & Hallström, I. (2017). An ethnographic observation study of the facilitator role in an implementation process. BMC research notes, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2962-5
  38. Vani, G. C., Raharjo, S. T., & Hidayat, E. N. (2015). Pengasuhan (good parenting) bagi anak dengan disabilitas. Prosiding Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 2(1).