Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial
Articles

Pekerjaan Sosial Pada Seting Sekolahan: Persepsi Sosial Terhadap Profil Pribadi Kreatif Dalam Perspektif Teori Implisit Kreatifitas

Ineu Maryani
Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Ahman
Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Juntika Nurihsan
Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Ilfiandra
Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Published 2023-08-10

Keywords

  • kreativitas, persepsi sosial, pribadi kreatif

How to Cite

Maryani, I. ., Ahman, Nurihsan, J. ., & Ilfiandra. (2023). Pekerjaan Sosial Pada Seting Sekolahan: Persepsi Sosial Terhadap Profil Pribadi Kreatif Dalam Perspektif Teori Implisit Kreatifitas. Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v12i2.3241

Abstract

Pekerja sosial pada setting sekolahan bertanggung jawab memberikan layanan secara menyeluruh disain program untuk pendidikan, karir, pribadi, dan pengembangan sosial untuk seluruh siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan mekanisme teor implisit kreativitas yaitu pengetahuan implisit guru bimbingan dan konseling terhadap profil pribadi kreatif (implisit knowledge of Creative Person) dan persepsi sosial guru bimbingan dan konseling terhadap profil pribadi kreatif (social perception of the creative person). Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Subject pada penelitian ini terdiri dari tiga orang guru bimbingan dan konseling yang bertugas di Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Kabupaten Bandung Barat - Jawa Barat. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan pengetahuan informan terhadap pribadi kreatif dikenal sebagai individu yang penuh semangat dan religius, pantang menyerah, tekun dan memiliki daya imajinasi tinggi. Sedangkan persepsi sosial informan terhadap orang kreatif mengharapkan bahwa keberadaan orang kreatif senantiasa bermanfaat bagi umat, selalu memberikan solusi bagi persoalan di masyarakat dengan karya yang inovatif, serta peduli terhadap kesejahteraan sosial di lingkungan masyarakat . Hasil penelitian ini bermanfaat bagi strategi peningkatan kreativitas melalui persepsi yang positif terhadap orang kreatif sehingga mendorong individu dalam segala bidang untuk meraih pencapaian kreatif dengan melakukan hal-hal baru, belajar hal baru, dan menyelesaikan sesuatu dengan cara dan inovasi baru.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1993). What Does a Theory of Creativity Require? Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 179 181 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0403_2
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58.
  4. Artha Manora Manurung, Novita Krisdayanti Tanjung, Y. D. B. T. (2021). Analisis Kinerja Guru BK dalam Merencanakan Program Layanan BK di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konselig, 1(1), 14.
  5. Assouad, A., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2018). Religion and innovation. A country institutional approach. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 15(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2017.1378589
  6. Brammer, L. M. (1988). The Helping Relationship: Process and Skills. In The University of Washington (4th ed.) Prentice Hall.
  7. Brougher, S. J., & Rantanen, E. M. (2009). Creativity and design: Creativity’s new definition and its relationship to design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1, 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1518/107118109x12524444081197
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The Systems Model of Creativity - The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. In The Nature of Creativity. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7
  9. D.J., Treffinger, S. G. I. (1992). Creative Problem Solving: An Introduction (Vol. 7, Issue 2). Center for Creative Learning.
  10. Dana, L. P. (2011). Religion as an explanatory variable for entrepreneurship. World Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009788161280
  11. Davis, G. A. (1995). Portrait of the creative person. Educational Forum, 59(4), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729509335074
  12. Day, N. E. (2005). Religion in the workplace: Correlates and consequences of individual behavior. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 2(1), 104–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766080509518568
  13. DiLiello, T. C., & Houghton, J. D. (2008). Creative Potential and Practised Creativity: Identifying Untapped Creativity in Organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00464.x
  14. Dionigi, R. A. (2015). Stereotypes of aging: Their effects on the health of older adults. Journal of Geriatrics, 2015, 1–9.
  15. Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023
  16. Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2017). Theories Of Personality, Eighth Edition. In Salemba Humanika (9th ed.). Mc Graw Hill.
  17. Gladding, S. T. (2008). The impact of creativity in counseling. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401380802226679
  18. Houran, J., & Ference, G. A. (2006). Nurturing Employee Creativity. HVS Ineternational, 8828(August).Hurlock, E. B. (1998). Child Development. Mc Graw Hill.
  19. Jung, H.-N., & Lee, C.-H. (2011). A Study on the Impact of Empathy and Creative Personality of a Counselor on the Working Alliance. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 12(4), 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2011.12.4.1663
  20. Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034898
  21. Kemenristekdikti. (2018). Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru.
  22. Kinai, T. K. (2013). Kenyan student-teacher counsellors’ creativity and its relationship with their gender, age, and
  23. teaching experience. 3(5), 296–304.
  24. Lawrence, C. (2012). Jumping off the couch: Infusing creativity into counselor education. ProQuest Dissertations
  25. and Theses, April, 283. https://doi.org/10.25774/w4-n7qq-y845
  26. Lawrence, C., Foster, V. A., & Tieso, C. L. (2015). Creating Creative Clinicians: Incorporating Creativity Into Counselor Education. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 10(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2014.963188
  27. Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Attitudes and social cognition stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421–1436.
  28. Liu, Z., Guo, Q., Sun, P., Wang, Z., & Wu, R. (2018). Does religion hinder creativity? A national level study on the roles of religiosity and different denominations. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01912
  29. Mark A. Runco, S. R. P. (2020). Encyclopedia of Creativity. In Enciclopedie of creativity (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
  30. Maryani, I. (2019). Program Peningkatan Kinerja Guru Bimbingan dan Konseling Berdasarkan Hasil Analisis
  31. Profesional. Journal Quanta, 3(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.22460/q.v1i1p1-10.49
  32. Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Rineka Cipta.
  33. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2015). The More Religiosity, the Less Creativity Across US Counties. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 1(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.18536/bcce.2015.07.1.1.09
  34. Rakhmawati, D. (2017). Konselor Sekolah Abad 21: Tantangan Dan Peluang. Jurnal Konseling GUSJIGANG, 3(1), 58–63.
  35. Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A crosscultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_12
  36. Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787148
  37. Shen, W., Yuan, Y., Yi, B., Liu, C., & Zhan, H. (2019). A Theoretical and Critical Examination on the Relationship between Creativity and Morality. Current Psychology, 38(2), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9613-9
  38. Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognotive, personal, development and social Aspect. American Psychologist, 55(June), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003
  39. Simonton, D. K., Kuo, S., Khayyam, O., Newton, I., Darwin, C., Curie, M., Einstein, A., Descartes, R., Galton, F., & James, W. (2018). Genius, Creativity, and Leadership. May, 302–317.
  40. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Creativity, and Wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607
  41. Stroebe, W., & Insko, C. A. (1989). Stereotype, Prejudice, and Discrimination: Changing Conceptions in Theory and Research. Stereotyping and Prejudice, d, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3582-8_1
  42. Supriadi, D. (1989). Kreativitas dan Orang-Orang Kreatif Dalam Lapangan Keilmuan : Profil Kehidupan Dan Psikologis Para Ilmuan Yunior dan Senior Di Indonesia Serta Implikasinya Bagi Pendidikan dan Bimbingan [IKIP BANDUNG]. http://digilib.upi.edu/digitalview.php?digital_id=1218
  43. Supriadi, D. (1994). Kreativitas, Kebudayaan dan Perkembangan Iptek. In Bandung. Alfabeta
  44. Zhang, Z. S., Hopp, M. D. S., Vialle, W., & Ziegler, A. (2020). Social Perceptions of a Creative Person: Stereotypes and Prejudice of a Creative Student among German Adolescents. Creativity Research Journal, 32(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1821565