Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial
Articles

Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Sekitar Hutan: Proses Penguatan Masyarakat Melalui Perhutanan Sosial di Kawasan Hutan Sesaot, NTB

  • Yumantoko
Yumantoko
Pusat Riset Kesejahteraan Sosial Desa dan Konektivitas. Organisasi Riset Tata Kelola Pemerintahan, Ekonomi, dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional. Jakarta. Indonesia

Published 2023-08-15

Keywords

  • perhutanan sosial, pemberdayaan, masyarakat, kehutanan

How to Cite

Yumantoko. (2023). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Sekitar Hutan: Proses Penguatan Masyarakat Melalui Perhutanan Sosial di Kawasan Hutan Sesaot, NTB. Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 11(2). Retrieved from https://e-journal.kemensos.go.id/index.php/jsk/article/view/3151

Copyright (c) 2023 Yumantoko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Program pemberdayaan masyarakat skema perhutanan sosial (PS) sudah lama berjalan. Program ini bertujuan untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan kehutanan yang mengancam sosial ekonomi masyarakat dan lingkungan. Namun program tersebut berjalan lambat dari target 12,7 juta hektar (dari 2014 hingga 2024), pada 2021 baru tercapai 4,5 juta hektar. Hal ini tidak lepas dari program itu sendiri kurang mengakomodir kebutuhan masyarakat lokal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana proses PS dengan melihat dari kacamata pemberdayaan itu sendiri. Studi membahas dari sisi informasi, partisipasi, akuntabilitas, dan lembaga lokal. Penelitian ini mengambil kasus PS di kawasan Sesaot, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif penelitian ini mewawancarai informan penting secara purposive. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa fasilitator dan petani masih kurang memahami informasi PS. Partisipasi masyarakat belum terlihat karena campur tangan fasilitator masih besar. Akuntabilitas dalam program pemberdayaan dilakukan dengan melaporkan hasil kegiatan untuk pihak-pihak tertentu. Kapasitas organisasi lokal perlu ditingkatkan agar petani menjadi berdaya. Terjadi penambahan aset dan kemampuan individu dalam mengembangkan usaha kehutanan, namun tidak semua masyarakat mendapat kesempatan yang sama.

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (2020). Does group farming empower rural women? Lessons from India’s experiments. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(4), 841–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1628020
  2. Andersson, K. P., Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. (2004). The Politics of Decentralized Natural Resource Governance. PS: Political Science & Politic, 37(3), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004597
  3. Berglund, B., Hallgren, L., & Aradóttir, Á. L. (2013). Cultivating Communication: Participatory Approaches in Land Restoration in Iceland. Ecology and Society, 18(2), art35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05516-180235
  4. Chapman, M., Satterfield, T., & Chan, K. M. A. (2019). When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs? Land Use Policy, 82, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.017
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=s4ViswEACAAJ
  6. de Jong, W. (2012). Discourses of community forestry. Forest-People Interfaces, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-749-3_6
  7. Djamhuri, T. L. (2008). Community participation in a social forestry program in Central Java, Indonesia: the effect of incentive structure and social capital. Agroforestry Systems, 74(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9150-5
  8. DLHK NTB. (2021). No Title. Tingkatkan Sinergitas Untuk Pemberdayaan Kemitraan Perhutanan Sosial Dan Kemitraan Lingkungan. https://dislhk.ntbprov.go.id/2021/06/15/tingkatkan-sinergitas-untuk-pemberdayaan-kemitraan-perhutanan-sosial-dan-kemitraan-lingkungan/
  9. Erbaugh, J. T. (2019). Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 109, 102019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102019
  10. Fisher, M.R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Kamaluddin, Judda, J., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia: recognition, livelihood and conservation? International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014
  11. Fisher, Micah R., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(1), 152. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
  12. Fisher, Micah R., & van der Muur, W. (2020). Misleading Icons of Communal Lands in Indonesia: Implications of Adat Forest Recognition From a Model Site in Kajang, Sulawesi. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670244
  13. Galudra, G. (2019). Focusing on facilitation: Issues and challenges of capacity development in Indonesia’s social forestry reforms. Forest and Society, 3(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5995
  14. Kilby, P. (2011). NGOs in India : the challenges of women’s empowerment and accountability. Routledge.
  15. KPH_Rinbar. (2019). Makalah Perkembangan (IUPHKm) Batu Mekar ”Gapoktan Alam Lestari. Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) Rinjani Barat.
  16. Lee, Y., Rianti, I. P., & Park, M. S. (2017). Measuring social capital in Indonesian community forest management. Forest Science and Technology, 13(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2017.1355335
  17. Lemay-Hébert, N. (2012). Coerced transitions in Timor-Leste and Kosovo: managing competing objectives of institution-building and local empowerment. Democratization, 19(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674358
  18. Liu, M., Yang, L., Bai, Y., & Min, Q. (2018). The impacts of farmers’ livelihood endowments on their participation in eco-compensation policies: Globally important agricultural heritage systems case studies from China. Land Use Policy, 77, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.054
  19. Luo, L., Wang, Y., & Qin, L. (2014). Incentives for promoting agricultural clean production technologies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.045
  20. Mbeche, R. M., & Dorward, P. (2014). Privatisation, empowerment and accountability: What are the policy implications for establishing effective farmer organisations? Land Use Policy, 36, 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.014
  21. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.
  22. Mittal, S., & Mehar, M. (2016). Socio-economic Factors Affecting Adoption of Modern Information and Communication Technology by Farmers in India: Analysis Using Multivariate Probit Model. The Journal ofAgricultural Education and Extension, 22(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.997255
  23. MoEF. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.83/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/10/2016 Tentang Perhutanan Sosial. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia.
  24. MoEF. (2021). Capaian TORA Dan Perhutanan Sosial Di Tahun 2021. http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/6330/capaian-tora-dan-perhutanan-sosial-di-tahun-2021
  25. Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Waty Bong, I., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social Forestry - why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484
  26. Narayan, D. (2002). Empowerment and Poverty Reduction : A Sourcebook. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15239
  27. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No 37 Tahun 2007 tentang Hutan Kemasyarakatan (HKm). (n.d.).
  28. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No 39 Tahun 2013 tentang Program Kemitraan Kehutanan. (n.d.).
  29. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor 49 Tahun 2008 Tentang Hutan Desa. (n.d.).
  30. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No 9 Tahun 2021Tentang Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial. (2021).
  31. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No 9 Tahun 2021Tentang Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial.
  32. PP No. 6 Tahun 2007. (2007). Peraturan Pemerintah No. 6 Tahun 2007 tentang Tata Hutan Dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan Serta Pemanfaatan Hutan.
  33. Purnomo, M., Hadiwiyono, E., Andriatmoko, N. D., Pariasa, I. I., Kustanti, A., & Faust, H. (2022). Transformation Role of Forest Farmer Group’s (FFGs) in Indonesia from Development Agent to Brokering Project. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082144
  34. Rakatama, A., & Pandit, R. (2020). Reviewing social forestry schemes in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102052
  35. ROSLINDA, E., EKYASTUTI, W., & KARTIKAWATI, S. M. (2017). Social capital of community forest management on Nusapati Village, Mempawah District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 18(2), 548–554. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d180215
  36. Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Erbaugh, J. T., Intarini, D., Dharmiasih, W., Makmur, M., Faturachmat, F., Verheijen, B., & Maryudi, A. (2020). The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes. Forest Policy and Economics, 120, 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102290
  37. Suharjito, D., & Wulandari, C. (2019). A reflection of Social Forestry in 2019: Towards inclusive and collaborative government approaches. Forest and Society, 3(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6099
  38. Suradireja, D. Y., Pramaria, A., Markum, Santoso, W. J., & Hakim, M. R. (2018). Menoleh Jalan Panjang Hutan Kemasyarakatan. Catatan Perjalanan Tiga Dasawarsa Program Hutan Kemasyarakatan di Pulau Lombok. CV Bee Media Publisher.
  39. Uphoff, N. (2005). Analytical Issues in Measuring Empowerment at the Community and Local Levels. In D. Narayan (Ed.), Measuring Empowerment : Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7441
  40. Waddington, H., Snilstveit, B., Hombrados, J., Vojtkova, M., Phillips, D., Davies, P., & White, H. (2014). Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.4073/CSR.2014.6
  41. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.
  42. Zakaria, A. K. (2010). Program Pengembangan Agribisnis Kedelai Dalam Peningkatan Produksi dan Pendapatan Petani. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pertanian, 29(4). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v29n4.2010.p147-153